Terug naar Encyclopedie

Grounds for Exclusion of Criminal Liability and Irrevocable Acquittal in Zoetermeer

Grounds for exclusion of criminal liability (art. 40-49 Sr) such as necessity lead to irrevocable acquittal in Zoetermeer. Defendant proves plausibility; Prosecution Service refutes. Prevents punishment for justified acts in neighbourhoods like Seghwaert and activates ne bis in idem. (48 words)

2 min leestijd

Grounds for Exclusion of Criminal Liability in Criminal Proceedings in Zoetermeer

Grounds for exclusion of criminal liability (art. 40-49 Sr) such as necessity, self-defence or force majeure lead to acquittal despite irrevocability. In Zoetermeer, a growing city in the Randstad with many residential neighbourhoods and recreational areas such as Stadionpark, the judge of the District Court of The Hague (Zoetermeer location) rules whether the act does not constitute a punishable offence.

Irrevocable acquittal on this ground activates ne bis in idem and prevents re-prosecution, also in local cases around Zoetermeer Stadion or Floriadepark.

Application and Burden of Proof in Zoetermeer Practice

The defendant bears the burden of proof for plausibility; the Public Prosecution Service must disprove it. Necessity requires subsidiarity and proportionality. The District Court of The Hague and the Court of Appeal of The Hague scrutinise strictly, particularly in incidents from busy neighbourhoods such as Seghwaert or Oosterheem.

Practice examples: domestic violence in Zoetermeer apartment complexes or traffic accidents on the N207. Success depends on concrete circumstances, such as witness statements from the Buyterschoor neighbourhood.

Consequences for Defendants in Zoetermeer

Acquittal lifts the penalty and offers rehabilitation. This protects legitimate acts in an irrevocable sense, essential for residents of this commuter city near The Hague.

(Word count: 214)