Terug naar Encyclopedie

Unfair terms in rental agreements Zoetermeer: recognition and consequences

Unfair terms in Zoetermeer rental agreements are void and disadvantage tenants. Recognise excessive repair obligations or illegal indexation, and have them struck out by the district court judge. (28 words)

2 min leestijd

In Zoetermeer, a growing municipality in the Randstad with many rental properties in neighbourhoods such as Buytenwegh and Seghwaert, unfair terms in rental agreements are void under Book 6 of the Dutch Civil Code (BW). These clauses disadvantage tenants disproportionately, for example a prohibition on pets without reasonable grounds or rent indexation above the statutory limit, which is particularly painful in a city with rising house prices. Article 6:236 BW lists general unfair terms, while Article 6:248 BW provides specific rental rules. Tenants in Zoetermeer can ignore these and ask the district court judge in The Hague – competent for the region – to declare them void. Landlords, often large housing associations such as Vidomes, may not abuse their position. Example: a clause obliging the tenant to carry out all repairs, even minor defects in a Zoetermeer apartment building, is void (Article 7:213 BW holds the landlord responsible). Check standard terms when signing, especially with local estate agents. The Rent Tribunal in the region or the district court offers mediation. Consequences: the provision is deemed never to have existed, the contract remains valid. Object within a reasonable period, otherwise tacit acceptance. Tips: check the model contracts of the Municipality of Zoetermeer or the central government for fair conditions. This way you prevent disputes with Council of State-like bodies and retain your rights in this rental-pressure city. (212 words)